In considering recent District political history, the necessary point of origin is the establishment of Home Rule in 1974. For much of the century prior to that, the District was governed by three presidentially-appointed commissioners. From 1967 to 1974, the District was governed by a single mayor-commissioner and a council, but all were still appointed by the President.
It was only with Congress’ passage of the Home Rule Act in the final days of 1973 that District residents received the right to elect their own local government. Incidentally, passage of the Home Rule Act followed a decade after District residents first voted in Presidential elections (the District’s previous local political victory) which came with the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment to the US Constitution in 1961. Prior to 1961, District residents elected no one.
Having established the creation of Home Rule as the Date Zero of local politics, it is logical that all subsequent Council activity is enumerated from that starting point. In the election held in November of 1974, thirteen Councilmembers were elected, and when their terms of office began in January of 1975, so did Council Period One.
Every two years since, when the new Councilmembers elected the previous November take office in January, a new Council Period begins, and is numbered sequentially. Absent any resignations or deaths, the idea is that the roster of Councilmembers during any given Council Period will remain the same throughout those two years.
Now, with the recent swearing-in ceremonies now in the past, we have entered Council Period 22, which welcomed the new Councilmembers elected in June of 2016. It will last from January of 2017 to January of 2019.
A final element of relevance related to Council Periods—any legislation (with very few exceptions) introduced during a given Council Period that is not approved by the Council by the last day of that Council Period dies through lack of action, and must be re-introduced in the new Council Period.
Perhaps the most central (and intriguing) element tied to the shift in Council Periods is the number, membership, and jurisdiction of the Council’s committees. From a DC policy wonk’s standpoint, perhaps the most central (and intriguing) element tied to the shift in Council Periods is the number, membership, and jurisdiction of the Council’s committees. The sum of these decisions is known as “Reorganization.” As each new Council Period begins, the Council Chair considers how the subject matter addressed by the Council would best be organized, then meets with each Councilmember and ascertains his/her interests. At some times in the Council’s history, each Councilmember was given a committee to chair. At other times, including currently, the number of committees is more limited, with committee chairmanships assigned based on tenure or other considerations.
If Council Periods are the two-year units that measure how far we have come from the time of Home Rule, then Legislative Meetings indicate how far into each Council Period we have come. When the Council cconvenes in January, that constitutes Legislative Meeting One of the Council Period. On the first Tuesday of each month, the full Council meets to consider legislation, and this is considered a “regular” legislative meeting. If, prior to the next monthly meeting, legislative action is needed, then an “additional legislative meeting” can be scheduled by the Chair.
Every legislative meeting, whether regular or additional, is numbered sequentially. For example, the final time that the previous Council met was considered the Thirty-Fifth (Additional) Legislative Meeting. This indicates that across the 24-month Council Period, the Council met on average roughly one and half times per month.
Having described the Council’s different key counting measures, in a future article, we will examine the different kinds of legislation the Council considers—temporary, emergency, ceremonial, etc.